Md. Mukhlesur Rahman: A nation’s economic structure stands upon several pillars. Agriculture, industry, trade, investment, exports, and infrastructure all play vital roles. Yet at the center of all these sectors lies the banking system, silently functioning as the bloodstream of the economy. The pace of economic activity, market stability, and the investment climate of a country depend largely on the health of its banking sector. However, the true foundation of this entire system is neither concrete buildings, sophisticated technology, nor paper capital; rather, it is the trust and confidence of the people.
A bank is fundamentally a trust-based institution. Ordinary citizens deposit their lifetime savings, business owners place their capital, expatriates send their hard-earned remittances, and retired individuals entrust their future security to banks with the belief that their money will remain safe. Once that trust begins to weaken, even the largest bank can become vulnerable and collapse. The real strength of a bank lies not in the amount of money it possesses, but in the confidence people have in it.
Economic history offers numerous examples of banks collapsing not because they were immediately insolvent, but because they lost public confidence. During the 2008 global financial crisis, many renowned financial institutions around the world fell into sudden turmoil primarily due to a crisis of confidence. Likewise, in recent years, banking crises in various countries have often been triggered by rumors, uncertainty, and growing distrust among depositors.
One of the fundamental realities of banking is that no bank keeps enough cash on hand to repay all depositors simultaneously. The business model of banking itself depends on using a significant portion of deposits for loans and investments. Therefore, when a large number of customers rush to withdraw their money at once, even a fundamentally healthy bank can face a severe liquidity crisis. In this sense, a crisis of confidence can become more dangerous than an actual financial crisis.
Bangladesh’s banking sector is currently passing through a period where this question of trust has become critically important. Over the past decade, the abnormal rise in non-performing loans, politically motivated loan approvals, the influence of powerful corporate groups, weak regulatory oversight, and the opaque management of several banks have created deep public concern. News reports involving the laundering of thousands of crores of taka, loans issued to fake companies, or excessive financing provided to particular business groups in violation of regulations naturally raise public doubts about the safety of their savings.
The greatest danger is that a crisis of confidence in banking rarely remains confined to a single institution. Irregularities in one bank gradually affect the credibility of the entire financial system. Most depositors do not analyze the financial statements of individual banks before making decisions; they place their trust in the banking sector as a whole. As a result, allegations of misconduct against one institution can severely undermine the reputation of the entire industry.
Another important aspect is that a banking crisis is not merely an economic issue; it also carries significant social and political consequences. When people lose confidence in banks, they begin seeking alternative ways to preserve wealth. Some buy gold, some hoard foreign currency, while others turn toward informal financial systems. Consequently, deposit flows into banks decline, investment becomes constrained, and the normal momentum of the economy weakens. Over time, this can contribute to inflationary pressure, instability in the currency market, and negative impacts on employment.
In the context of Bangladesh, the issue is even more sensitive in the Islamic banking sector. Here, people’s relationship with banks is not solely financial; it is also deeply connected to religious conviction. Many individuals avoid conventional banking and choose Islamic banks based on ethical and religious considerations. Therefore, if allegations of political influence, irregularities, weak Shariah compliance, or corporate exploitation emerge within this sector, the credibility of not just one institution but the entire Islamic financial system comes into question.
Under such circumstances, the role of the central bank becomes extremely important. Bangladesh Bank must act not only as an administrative regulator but also as the guardian of public confidence. The culture of keeping weak banks alive for political considerations must end. Timely audits, transparent disclosure of financial information, strict recovery of defaulted loans, and ensuring accountability in bank management have now become urgent necessities.
Most importantly, bank boards must be made professional and accountable. In many cases, bank boards are formed not on the basis of competence and expertise but on political or group influence. This weakens the decision-making process within financial institutions. Yet managing a bank is not merely a business matter; it is a national responsibility tied to the security of millions of depositors’ funds.
The government must also understand that the banking sector cannot be treated merely as a short-term instrument for economic growth. Political favoritism in loan distribution may create temporary growth figures, but in the long run it exposes the entire economy to serious risk. Once public trust in the banking system is destroyed, restoring it becomes extremely difficult—and in some cases impossible.
The role of the media and social media is equally significant. On one hand, spreading unverified rumors and creating panic is irresponsible; on the other hand, concealing genuine irregularities is equally harmful. Information dissemination must therefore remain responsible, truthful, and centered on the public interest.
An economy becomes truly strong when people can trust its financial institutions. Once confidence in the banking sector is lost, it cannot be restored merely through legal reforms, stimulus packages, or cosmetic measures. What is required are integrity, accountability, professionalism, and genuine political commitment.
Today, the greatest challenge facing Bangladesh’s banking sector is not a shortage of capital, but a shortage of trust and confidence. If effective measures are not taken immediately to address this crisis, the future cost will not be borne by banks alone but by the entire nation. History teaches us a simple lesson: when a bank loses public trust, its survival ultimately becomes extremely difficult.
Author: Md. Mukhlesur Rahman is the Islamic Economist, Social Thinker, and Human Rights Activist.

বুধবার, ০৩ জুন ২০২৬
Publish Date : 29 May 2026

Write Your Opinion